Legal Opinion
Meade v. Chestnut
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 29, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bel-latoni, J.), entered March 15, 2007, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants City of Mount Vernon and Mount Vernon Folice Department which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
“The manner in which a police officer operates his or her vehicle in [responding to] an emergency…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Saarinen v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Campbell v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Badalamenti v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tutrani v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Krulik v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rincon v. DusenburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Rincon v. DusenburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Wong v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020