Legal Opinion

Res'publica v. Wray

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

THE Defendant on the lit of June, 1798, had been appointed treafurer for the County of Cumberland', “ for three years, to commence on the 5th of June followingi” but upon a fuggeftion of improper practices in procuring the appointment, the Attorney General obtained a rule to ihew caufe, why an information in the nature of a writ of quo ivarranto ihould not be filed againft him.

Read the full summary

THE Defendant on the lit of June, 1798, had been appointed treafurer for the County of Cumberland', “ for three years, to commence on the 5th of June followingi” but upon a fuggeftion of improper practices in procuring the appointment, the Attorney General obtained a rule to ihew caufe, why an information in the nature of a writ of quo ivarranto ihould not be filed againft him. In fupport of the rule, affidavits and office papers were produced, with a view to ihew, that the Defendant was in em-barraffed circumftances; and that he had procured the vote of one of the County Ccmmiffioners,…

1Opinion of the Court

The rule was oppofed by Dallas and MíKean-, and the opinion of the court in the abfence of the Chief Justice, was delivered by

Shitpen, Joffice.

The prefent is the firft inftance, that we recoliefl:, of an application of this kind in Pennfyluania-, and on opening jthe cafe, .it ftrock us to be within the ioth feftion of the 9th Article of the Co!)ftitution,’whichdeclares,.“ thatno “ pcifon ftiall for any indiiSable offence, be proceeded againft “ criminally by information,” except in-cafes that ara not in- yolved In the prefent motion. But, on conftderation, it is evident, that the Conftitution…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. M'CloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
  2. Brian Davis v. Delta Air Lines Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  3. John Reynolds v. Steve Gordon, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
  4. Milito v. Snap IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API