Smitley v. Nau
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This action involves a suit on a promissory note brought by the appellants against the appellees.
The facts as found in the record, and most favorable, to the appellees, reveal that the appellees executed a promissory note on February 12, 1964, to guarantee payment of a commission for the sale of real estate allegedly owed to the appellant by Mr. C. N. Nau, father of the appellee, Thomas T. Nau. The noté provided for the payment of $5,500 on' or before March 18, 1964, at the Mercantile National Bank, Hammond, Indiana, and was signed by the appellees.
The appellant filed a Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Furst & Bradley Manufacturing Co. v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Countee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Barney v. Yazoo Delta Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Fulton v. LoughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- H. H. Woodsmall & Co. v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rogier v. American Testing & Engineering Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Nichols v. MinnickIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Gemmer v. Anthony Wayne BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Bowyer v. Clark Equipment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976