Legal Opinion · Dissent

Siegel v. Greenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1981Published

1Dissent

Birns, J. P., and Fein, J., dissent in a memorandum by Fein, J., as follows:

The order of Justice Schwartz should be affirmed in all respects, as one being made in the proper exercise of discretion. On September 22, 1978, plaintiffs instituted a malpractice action against Drs. Turetsky and Datlof in Queens County. It was alleged, in substance, that defendants’ malpractice consisted of the treatment of plaintiff wife’s obesity from January through July of 1976, that as a result she had become hopelessly addicted to amphetamines and *518suffered physical disability including liver ailments. Venue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Vigo Steamship Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Inspiration Enterprises, Inc. v. Inland Credit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Gibbons v. GroatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Weiss v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API