Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cancelliere Cancelliere

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1930No. Appeals 201 and 202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Curiam,

The defendants were convicted of assault and battery. Motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial were made on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and against the weight of the evidence. Afterwards, an additional reason was filed, stating that the stenographer’s notes which embodied the record in the case were lost and the defendants were thereby unable to properly perfect the record. The court refused the motions. Appeals were taken and the matter came before our court and we sent the record back in order that the lower court, if it thought proper, might grant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DonatoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Headley v. Tompkins Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KimbleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Commonwealth v. BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API