Legal Opinion
Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 23, 2020No. 3:17-cv-01436Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP, Case No.: 17cv1436-GPC-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 v. RECONSIDERATION 14 ROBERT ROSETTE; ROSETTE & [ECF No. 292] ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP; 15 QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT 16 YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION, a federally-recognized Indian tribe; and 17 DOES 1 THROUGH 100, 18 Defendants. 19 20 Before the Court is Plaintiff Williams & Cochrane’s (“W&C”) motion asking this 21 Court to reconsider the Honorable Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg’s Order (ECF No. 22 23 284) on April…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Robert L. Clarke, Comptroller of the Currency v. American Commerce National Bank, Anaheim, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Perrignon v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Mary Wilcox v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.