Legal Opinion
Daniel G. Suber & Associates v. Edward Smith
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 2013No. 45A04-1205-CT-278Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: DANIEL G. SUBER KEVIN G. KERR LIZABETH R. HOPKINS Hoeppner Wagner & Evans, LLP Daniel G. Suber & Associates Valparaiso, Indiana Valparaiso, Indiana IN THE Apr 01 2013, 9:40 am COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA DANIEL G. SUBER & ASSOCIATES, ) ) Appellant-Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 45A04-1205-CT-278 ) EDWARD SMITH, ) )…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thacker v. WentzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Liggett v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Krieg v. HieberIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Greensburg Local 761 Printing Specialities v. RobbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Nunn Law Office v. RosenthalIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.