Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Moline Plough Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 20, 1886No. 72PublishedCited by 16 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE ■ TERRITORY OF DAKOTA. This was an action at law on a contract of guaranty. Judgment for- the plaintiff, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the Territory. , The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justioe Miller

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Dakota. The action was brought by the Moline Plough. Company, as plaintiff, against Herman Gilbert and Jacob ; Schartzel, defendants. It was tried before a jury, and verdict rendered for the plaintiff.' This judgment, on appeal to the Supreme Court of the Territory, was affirmed. The suit was founded on the following instrument in writing, signed by 'the defendants:

“Sioux Falls, D.T., Ma/rch 9th, 1878.
“ Moline Plough Go., Moline, 111.

■ “Sirs: Wej the undersigned, are…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Hoffer v. BurdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Union Selling Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Basnight v. Southern Jobbing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API