Ex Parte Musgrave
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
This action in habeas corpus was instituted by the petitioner, Charles L. Musgrave, for the purpose of securing his release from confinement in the State Penitentiary.
Two propositions are presented by the petitioner: First, there is a variance in the allegations of the information from those set forth in the preliminary complaint; second, the punishment imposed upon petitioner’s plea of guilty was excessive and should be modified.
Certified copies of the information and the preliminary complaint are not attached to the petition, but-the petitioner makes the general allegation that in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Muldrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- Ex Parte VanderburgCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Landon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Ex Parte OwenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beaird v. RameyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- In Re Writ of Habeas Corpus of DareCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Ervin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Beaird v. RameyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951