Legal Opinion

State v. Pittard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1980No. 7912SC871PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant’s assignments of error are geared to the basic proposition that a relationship of teacher-student existed between defendant and Valerie and that defendant stood in loco parentis to Valerie while she was present at the center. Defendant argues that in such a relationship, the punishment she administered to Valerie was justified for corrective and disciplinary reasons. Defendant maintains that if she stood in loco parentis to Valerie or if there was a relationship of teacher-student, the jury could not find her guilty of assault unless it found either that the punishment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shook v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Nova University, Inc. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. In re T.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Simms v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API