State v. Pittard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant’s assignments of error are geared to the basic proposition that a relationship of teacher-student existed between defendant and Valerie and that defendant stood in loco parentis to Valerie while she was present at the center. Defendant argues that in such a relationship, the punishment she administered to Valerie was justified for corrective and disciplinary reasons. Defendant maintains that if she stood in loco parentis to Valerie or if there was a relationship of teacher-student, the jury could not find her guilty of assault unless it found either that the punishment…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shook v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Nova University, Inc. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- In re T.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Simms v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.