State v. Hurst
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CLAYTON, District Judge.
Petitioners, William Hurst and' Virgil Lindsey, Deputy Sheriffs of Marshall County, Mississippi, who each failed to make a timely demand for a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and are deemed to have waived’ their right to the same, Rule 38(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, have each filed a motion in this court for a jury trial under Rule 39(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs resist these motions, although other' defendants have asked for and will have’ a jury.
The Seventh Amendment…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Louise Parrott, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Parrott, Deceased v. Max v. Wilson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Burgess v. HendleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1991
- Judge v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
- McKnight v. DyerDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1973
- Priest v. RhodesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.