Legal Opinion

Johnny Hunter v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 30, 1982No. 81-5536PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

The appellant, Johnny Hunter, filed a pro se petition for the writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254, in which he contended that the Florida Parole and Probation Commission violated his right to due process by improperly calculating his presumptive parole release date. Acting upon a recommendation of the magistrate, the district court dismissed the action for the reason that the Florida parole statutes create no constitutionally protected liberty interest.

The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies when government action deprives a person of liberty or property. Greenholtz…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Michael Earl Staton v. Louie L. Wainwright and Maurice G. CrockettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Donald F. Buxton v. City of Plant City, Florida, Troy E. Surrency, Individually, Troy E. Surrency, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. George Samuel Jonas v. Louie L. Wainwright, Sec., Florida Department of Corrections, Florida Parole & Pro. CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Harry Slocum v. Georgia State Board Of Pardons And ParolesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Slocum v. Georgia State Board of Pardons & ParolesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Charles J. Arndt, Inc., a Corporation v. City of Birmingham, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API