Legal Opinion

Bowling Green v. Martin Land Development Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 1, 2009No. 08-5353PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, the Bowling Green and Warren County Airport Board (“Airport Board”) and Geoff Fields (“Fields”), appeal from the district court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants, Martin Land Development Company, Inc. (“Martin”) and Co-Mar Aviation, Inc. (“Co-Mar”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants on the ground that 49 U.S.C. § 40103 does not imply a private right of action. Although other circuits have addressed the issue, this is a matter of first impression for this Court. For the reasons set forth herein,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rabbers v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Traverse Bay Area Intermediate School District v. Michigan Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Golf Village N., LLC v. City of Powell, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. Estate of Robert Cornell, Jr. v. Bayview Loan ServicingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  5. Premo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API