Legal Opinion · Dissent

Magee v. Crown Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 19, 1942Published

1Dissent

I cannot concur in the opinion and judgment of the majority in this case on the question of usury. I think the plea of usury as incorporated in the answer of the appellants in this case was, inferentially at least, held to be suffiicent by this Court in the case of Tucker as Trustee of Bula E. Croker, Bankrupt, et al., v. Crown Corporation, 146 Fla. 329, 200 So. 844. The evidence on this question is familiar to counsel for the parties and to the members to this Court, and no good purpose could be subserved by reviewing this evidence. Suffice it to say that in my opinion the plea of usury was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ConnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. The Richter Jewelry Co. v. SchweinertSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Purvis v. FrinkSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  4. Sullivan Et Vir v. Thumm Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Hopkins v. OttoSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API