Legal Opinion

Cohoon v. . State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

An objection tbat tbe court has no jurisdiction of tbe . subject-matter or tbat tbe complaint does not state a cause of action is not waived by tbe filing of an answer. O. S., 518; Knowles v. R. R., 102 N. C., 59. So, after answering, tbe defendants moved in limine to dismiss tbe proceeding on tbe ground tbat this Court has no original jurisdiction of tbe cause stated in tbe complaint. Tbe motion, we think, should be granted.

Tbe Supreme Court is given original jurisdiction to bear claims against tbe State, but its decisions are merely recommendatory; they must be reported to tbe next session…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Knowles v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Bledsoe v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  3. Calkins Dredging Co. v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Bain v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Lacy v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vinson v. . O'BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API