Commonwealth v. Hunt
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Paul C. Edwards, a witness to the principal crime of which the defendant Hunt was found guilty, armed assault with intent to murder, had removed to England and was not available to testify.1 Earlier, Edwards had testified and had been cross-examined at a probable cause hearing. His recorded testimony was read to the jury over the objection of the defendant. On appeal, the defendant argues that the *292Commonwealth made an insufficient showing of Edwards’s unavailability. There are also assertions of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
Edwards is a resident of Manchester, England, and a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. KeysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- Commonwealth v. SenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Commonwealth v. LoperaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.