Legal Opinion

Canterbury Candy Makers v. Brecht Candy Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 7, 1924No. 1561PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

In this proceeding the Brecht Candy Company seeks the cancellation of a trade-mark of the Canterbury Candy Makers, which comprises the word “Canterbury” associated with a swinging sign carried by a support. On the sign are the words “Canterbury Candies, Seattle.” Apart from the drawing shown in the certifi*1014cate of registration, “Candies” and “Seattle” are disclaimed. The Brecht Candy Company’s mark consists of a bracket from which a sign depends. On the sign are the words “Von Brecht,” which áre disclaimed. The mark was adopted by it before the registrant adopted its mark.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coca-Cola Co. v. Chero-Cola Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Chasity WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. MosesianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Sharp & Dohme v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. American Distilling Co. v. Bellows & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API