Legal Opinion

Clark v. Midfast Bank

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 27, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00335Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TORRANCE CLARK CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 24-335 MIDFIRST BANK ET AL. SECTION “R” (5) ORDER Plaintiff Torrance Clark, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against defendants Midfirst Bank, Midland Mortgage, Wells Fargo, and Citi Group Insurance.1 Chief Magistrate Judge Michael North issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that Clark’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice as legally frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.2 The Court did not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Lawrence Edward Thompson v. Kerry RasberryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Alvaro L. Hernandez, Jr. v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Mario DuranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API