Legal Opinion

Claim of Alcott-Avery v. Finger Lakes Regional Health

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mercure, J.P.

We affirm. Pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (8) (f), an employer seeking contribution from the Fund in a case that has been reopened must file a claim in writing with the Board “no later than the determination of permanency upon such reopening.” The question here is when the determination of permanency was made — whether it was upon the signing of *1228the stipulation and its acceptance by the WCLJ at the hearing, as the Fund contends, or whether it was upon the issuance of the WCLJ’s written decision, which the employer argues and the Board determined.

Pursuant to 12 NYCRR…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Scally v. Ravena Coeymans Selkirk Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Claim of Turdo v. Dellicato VineyardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Claim of Copak v. Our Lady of VictoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API