Legal Opinion
Commerzbank AG v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 2017No. 16cv4569PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, United States District Judge:
Defendants U.S. Bank National Association and Bank of America National Association move to dismiss Commerzbank AG’s claims. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This action arises from the sale of residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”). RMBS are abstruse financial products that were integral in the rapid rise and precipitous fall of the U.S. housing market during the aughts. The collapse of the housing bubble sent the economy into a tailspin,' and spawned a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Harris v. Provident Life And Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Hydro Investors, Inc. v. Trafalgar Power Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ambac Assurance Corp. v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Ambac Assurance Corporation v. The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024
- Bakal v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Basso v. New York UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Commerzbank A.G. v. U.S. Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.