Legal Opinion

Santee River Hardwood Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 29, 1956No. Docket No. 37712Published

1. Claim for relief under section 722 (b) (4) and (b) (5) denied, where petitioner failed to establish that its base period net income was an inadequate standard of normal earnings because of allegedly unfavorable terms of a contract under which it operated until near the end of the base period. 2. Petitioner's claim for relief under section 722 (b) (5), based upon disparity between depreciation deductions in base period years and taxable year, denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Santee River Hardwood Company, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Santee River Hardwood Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 37712

United States Tax Court

26 T.C. 755; 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 132;

June 29, 1956, Filed

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

1. Claim for relief under section 722 (b) (4) and (b) (5) denied, where petitioner failed to establish that its base period net income was an inadequate standard of normal earnings because of allegedly unfavorable terms of a contract under which it operated until near the end of the base period.

2. Petitioner's claim for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Farmer Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  2. Granite Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  3. Clinton Carpet Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  4. Clermont Groves, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  5. Constitution Publishing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API