Hill v. Watford
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice:
Respondents Thomas E. Hill and Mary Lee Hill brought this action to compel specific performance of an oral contract to convey land. The court below overruled appellant J. Larry Watford and the other named defendant’s demurrer, finding the allegations of the complaint sufficient to avoid the Statute of Frauds. We agree and affirm.
*345The complaint alleged improvements to the property, including the installation of a private septic tank system, as sufficient part performance by respondents to remove the oral contract from the statute.
In passing on a demurrer we are not so concerned…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McMillan v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Turner v. ABC JALOUSIE CO. OF NCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Aust v. BeardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Crowley v. Bob Jones UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- McMillan v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. LeveretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987