Legal Opinion · Dissent

Progressive Insurance v. Wasoka

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 8, 2005No. 03-451Published

1Dissent

Dooley, J.,

¶ 29. dissenting. Since Progressive Insurance Company’s argument to this Court is based on its claim that it never made a summary judgment motion based on fraudulent inducement, Progressive will immediately capture the thrust of the majority’s opinion from the opening sentence: “Progressive Insurance Company appeals from a denial of its motion for summary judgment against its insured, Gregory Wasoka, for fraud in the inducement of *351an automobile insurance policy.” Ante, ¶ 1. I believe the opening sentence is symptomatic of the short shrift that the Court’s decision has given to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bridgeway Corporation v. Citibank, Doing Business as Citicorp N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Cia. Petrolera Caribe, Inc. v. Arco Caribbean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Samplid Enterprises, Inc. v. First Vermont BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. Kelly v. Town of BarnardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Sabia v. NevilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API