Progressive Insurance v. Wasoka
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Dissent
Dooley, J.,
¶ 29. dissenting. Since Progressive Insurance Company’s argument to this Court is based on its claim that it never made a summary judgment motion based on fraudulent inducement, Progressive will immediately capture the thrust of the majority’s opinion from the opening sentence: “Progressive Insurance Company appeals from a denial of its motion for summary judgment against its insured, Gregory Wasoka, for fraud in the inducement of *351an automobile insurance policy.” Ante, ¶ 1. I believe the opening sentence is symptomatic of the short shrift that the Court’s decision has given to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bridgeway Corporation v. Citibank, Doing Business as Citicorp N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Cia. Petrolera Caribe, Inc. v. Arco Caribbean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Samplid Enterprises, Inc. v. First Vermont BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Kelly v. Town of BarnardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Sabia v. NevilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.