Legal Opinion

Hope v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1932No. 30,636PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for damages on account of failure *354to carry out a contract to lease a building. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Appellee owned a mercantile building. It was occupied by two tenants who were paying rent. Appellant desired to locate a filling station. Through an authorized agent appellant negotiated with appellee for a lease on his building. A lease was agreed on. It was drawn up and signed by appellee. It was sent to the office of appellant for approval. All parties understood that the lease would not be binding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deisher v. SteinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Rains v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Curtis S. Glasscock v. Wilson Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Wade v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API