Legal Opinion

United States v. Melissa Beecroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 13, 2016No. 12-10175PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

Following her convictions for participating in an extensive mortgage-fraud conspiracy, a defendant was ordered to pay more than $2 million in restitution and to forfeit more than $100 million. We must decide whether either amount was erroneously calculated or unconstitutionally excessive.

I

A

From roughly 2003 through 2008, Melissa Beecroft took part in a multi-million dollar residential mortgage-fraud scheme in the Las Vegas area. Led by Steven Grimm and Eve Mazzarella, the conspirators recruited and paid straw purchasers 1 to buy homes at substantially…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Ocasio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Bikundi, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. State v. R. GibbonsMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  3. United States v. Abhijit PrasadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. $11,500.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. $11,500.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API