United States v. Melissa Beecroft
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
Following her convictions for participating in an extensive mortgage-fraud conspiracy, a defendant was ordered to pay more than $2 million in restitution and to forfeit more than $100 million. We must decide whether either amount was erroneously calculated or unconstitutionally excessive.
I
A
From roughly 2003 through 2008, Melissa Beecroft took part in a multi-million dollar residential mortgage-fraud scheme in the Las Vegas area. Led by Steven Grimm and Eve Mazzarella, the conspirators recruited and paid straw purchasers 1 to buy homes at substantially…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Ocasio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Michael Bikundi, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- State v. R. GibbonsMontana Supreme Court · 2024
- United States v. Abhijit PrasadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. $11,500.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. $11,500.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.