Legal Opinion

Ex parte Sewell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 2016No. 14-15-00640-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Ken Wise, Justice

Appellant Michael Brent Sewell appeals from the denial of his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus challenging the constitutionality of section 21.15(b)(2) of the Texas Penal Code.

Op December 18, 2015, the State dismissed the underlying charge under section 21.15(b)(2) in exchange for appellant’s guilty plea to another offense in a separate case. Because appellant is no longer confined on the charge he challenged in his pretrial writ of habeas corpus, appellant’s appeal of the denial of that writ‘is moot. See Martinez v. State, 826 S.W.2d 620…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Billy Wilson v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2024
  2. Ex Parte Elwin Roberto Ortiz Lagos v. ., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2024
  3. Ex Parte Jonathan Ingram v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2023
  4. Ex Parte Oscar Gamboa Quezada v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023
  5. Ex Parte Robert Joseph Yezak v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2026

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API