Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fiala v. Motor Vehicles Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 17, 1977No. 421-646, CA 7277Published

1ConcurrenceTanzer, J.

I concur because, as we noted in Maupin v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 20 Or App 77, 530 P2d 866 (1975), no responsive pleading is required by ORS 482.560(1). The gratuitous discussion by the majority regarding the nature and utility of responsive pleadings is therefore dicta in which I do not join.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maupin v. State ex rel. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975