Aluminum Manufactures, Inc. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
WILKIN, District Judge.
The question to be determined in this case is whether the plaintiff was carrying on or doing business during the taxable period. Or, stated differently, did the activity of the company during the taxable period subject it to the tax imposed by Section 215 of the National Industrial Recovery Act, 48 Stat. 207 ?
The evidence establishes that prior to the taxable period the plaintiff had sold its merchandise to the Aluminum Corporation of America, and had leased all its real estate, buildings, machinery, equipment, apparatus, etc., for twenty-five years, granting at the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Zonne v. Minneapolis SyndicateSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Traction Cos. v. Collectors of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- National Commercial Title & Mortgage Guaranty Co. v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943