Legal Opinion

State v. Boggs, 22081 (3-28-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2008No. 22081PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This matter is before the Court on the direct appeal of Defendant-Appellant Patrick Boggs from his conviction for escape. The crux of this appeal is whether a defendant on post release control is under detention as defined in R.C. § 2921.01(E) for purposes of a conviction for escape pursuant to R.C. § 2921.34(A)(1). Because there is no reason to treat a defendant on post release control differently than one on parole, we find that the State offered sufficient evidence to overcome Bogg's Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal. The judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

I

{¶ 2} In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PointerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. Jordan, 9-08-11 (9-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. Hobson, 22842 (12-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API