In re the Accounting of Hanover Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Breitel, J. P.
Involved on this appeal is the construction of a will and codicil. The Surrogate held that a trust created by the codicil would lapse shortly into intestacy, despite a general residuary clause in the will. The practical effect is to favor the husband and son of the testatrix, rather than the son and his children who are the beneficiaries of the trusts created out of the residuary estate. The amount of the disputed trust is small in relation to the whole estate, and, under any interpretation, does not pass outside the circle of designated beneficiaries of the will.
For reasons to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wright v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In Re the Accounting of TamargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Matter of HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Lamb v. . LambNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Masterson v. . TownshendNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Renaud v. RenaudCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- In re the Estate of KoellnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986