Legal Opinion
OSRecovery, Inc. v. One Groupe International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 21, 2005No. 02 Civ.8993(LAK)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
This is a civil action based on an alleged scheme involving the sale of an allegedly non-existent gold-backed Internet currency and the operation of a massive Ponzi scheme. Latvian Economic Commercial Bank (“Lateko”) and Parex Bank (“Parex”), which is also Latvian, allegedly participated in the scheme. The third amended complaint (the “Complaint”) asserts claims against the banks under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 1 as well as various state law claims. The matter is before the Court on Lateko’s motion to dismiss.
I.…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. WinnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Kirschner v. BennettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- CHEMTEX, LLC v. St. Anthony Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.