Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Safran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 18, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: The Trial Justice correctly charged the jury that the crux of the lawsuit was whether or not defendant should have seen the the wire, contact with which by her automobile caused plaintiff’s injuries, and also that plaintiff had the burden of proving that defendant saw or was bound to see the wire in time to avoid injury to plaintiff. (See Bush v. Goodno, 233 App. Div. 152, affd. 259 N. Y. 538.) However, he also charged subdivision 1 of section 56 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, relating to speed of operation of a motor vehicle on a highway, making no reference to any evidence upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bush v. GoodnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Bush v. GoodnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Uliaszek v. BuczkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. City of Auburn v. RoateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API