Legal Opinion

Pingatore v. Union Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 20, 2017No. CV-16-810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrandon J. Harrison, Judge

'hThis summary-judgment case involves an employee’s privacy rights in the employment drug-testing context. Larry Pin-gatore has been employed by Union Pacific Railroad (UP) since at least 2002. He worked as a signalman in California for UP. He took a two-month leave of absence in 2002 and a six-month leave in 2005. In 2005 Pingatore went through inpatient substance-abuse treatment for alcoholism. After that' absence, the company began drug testing him more frequently.

A third leave of absence was taken in 2007, for four months, when Pingatore on his own initiative participated in an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Dodrill v. Arkansas Democrat Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Navorro-Monzo v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. McMullen v. McHughes Law FirmSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joshua Duggar v. City of Springdale, Arkansas, and Washington County, ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Rodney Horne v. James Michael Teague; Corey James Rains; Christopher Michael Lawrence; Marty Daniel Boyd, Craighead County Sheriff; COUNTY OF CRAIGHEAD; and JOHN DOES 1-5District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026
  3. Thornton v. ThorntonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API