Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Alabama Farm Bureau Federation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 3 Div. 15PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was on a contract and resulted in judgment for defendant.

The appeal is from a judgment of nonsuit suffered by the plaintiff as a consequence of the action of the trial court sustaining demurrers to the complaint.

Count 1 alleges that in the year 1930, plaintiff, H. L. Wagner, as seller,' and defendant, Alabama Farm Bureau Federation, as buyer, entered into a contract by which the plaintiff agreed to sell and defendant agreed to buy all of the Austrian winter peas grown by plaintiff, seller, on 1,000 acres during the season 1930 — 31; that thereafter plaintiff and defendant modified…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McIntyre Lumber & Export Co. v. Jackson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Boykin v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Jones v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Elmore, Quillian & Co. v. Parrish Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Electric Lighting Co. of Mobile v. Elder Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Air Engineers, Inc. v. ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Bentley-Beale, Inc. v. Wesson Oil & Snowdrift Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Air Engineers, Inc. v. ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API