Carr v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Plaintiff John C. Carr seeks review of his suspension and discharge by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”). Both actions were taken pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7532 (1982), which authorizes the head of an agency to suspend or remove an employee when he considers such action necessary in the interests of national security.1 Plaintiff has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings; defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment that both addresses the merits and challenges this court’s jurisdiction to hear Carr’s claim that he was improperly suspended and discharged.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John C. Carr v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Mosely v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Carr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989