Legal Opinion

City of Worcester v. Inhabitants of Auburn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1862Published

1Opinion of the CourtMetcalf, J.

This action is for the recovery of expenses paid by the plaintiffs for the support of Nathaniel Elder, who is alleged to be a pauper having his lawful settlement in the town of Auburn.

It is clear, upon the facts of the case, that Elder’s original settlement was in Worcester, derived from his ancestors, who . resided on lands that were detached from Worcester and annexed to Auburn, by St. 1850, c. 243, which provided, § 4, that persons who had gained a settlement in Worcester by having been residents on those lands, or who derived such settlement from such residents, if they should come to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Inhabitants of East Sudbury v. Inhabitants of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API