Legal Opinion

Bellis v. Hann Kendall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1913PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Dallas County Court; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge. Action by Hann & Kendall against E. A. Beilis. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

Appellees sued in the court below, alleging that appellant had employed them to sell a house and lot in the city of Dallas and agreed to pay them certain commissions in the event they found a purchaser for the property, and that through their efforts the property was sold. Appellant answered the suit by general demurrer and general denial. Trial by jury resulted in verdict for appellees, followed by judgment of the court. From said proceeding this appeal is taken.

The undisputed facts in the case are, in substance, that the property of appellant, a residence in the city of Dallas, was placed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graves v. Bains & WoodwardTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Edwards v. PikeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Duval v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Wood v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hodde v. Malone Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Shaw v. FairesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Spires v. MannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Walker v. Van ValkenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Millage v. IrwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API