Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 25, 2012No. Docket 08-1194-cv(L), 08-1195-cv(CON)Published

1DissentHall, Circuit Judge

Federal question jurisdiction exists where, inter alia, it is clear from the face of the complaint that “the plaintiffs right to relief necessarily depends on the resolution of a substantial question of federal law.” Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 27-28, 103 S.Ct. 2841, 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). From the record and the pleadings, the tribe is fee simple owner of West-woods and occupies that tract of land outright, invoking at the outset of the case a presumption that Westwoods is Indian land and is thus beyond the regulatory purview of the state. Only by…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API