Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael D. Stallman, J.
On remand from the Court of Appeals, petitioners move for “incidental damages” in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
The background of this litigation was succinctly set forth in the decision of the Court of Appeals:
“Regulations of the New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission limit the rates that may be charged by owners of taxicabs who lease those cabs to drivers. In this case, owners challenge a Commission regulation that prohibits owners from collecting sales tax in addition to the maximum permitted lease rates. We hold that the regulation must be…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Haddock v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Gross v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Barrett v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ahmed v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2014