Legal Opinion

Becker v. Calmenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1907No. Nos. 15,439—(80)Published

Action in the district court for Chippewa county tO’ recover $128.30 upon a contract. The case was tried before Qvale, J., who directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $128.30. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS. J.

The complaint alleges that May 16, 1905, appellant ordered of respondents goods, wares, and merchandise to be specially manufactured for him, of the value of $746.50. This action is brought to recover damages for a repudiation of the contract by appellant. The answer admitted the giying of an order for certain goods, denied that the same were to be specially manufactured, and alleged that when the order was given it was agreed between the parties that appellant should be privileged to examine goods of like character handled by other firms and cancel his order with respondents if he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schloss v. JosephsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API