Legal Opinion

State v. Sewell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 2, 2019No. 20/18Published

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

It is a fundamental rule of law that the public has a right to every persons' evidence. There are a small number of constitutional, common-law and statutory exceptions to that general rule, but they have been neither "lightly created nor expansively construed, for they are in derogation of the search for truth."

Ashford v. State , 147 Md. App. 1 , 63, 807 A.2d 732 (2002) (Moylan, J.) (emphasis removed) (quoting In re Cueto , 554 F.2d 14 , 15 (2d Cir. 1977) ). These exceptions are commonly known as privileges. This case asks us to balance the search for truth against one of the strongest…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Robeson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. United States v. BretonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Forma-Pack, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Benik v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API