Legal Opinion

Davis v. Slocomb

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1923No. 3950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). [1] Error is assigned to the denial of the defendant’s motion for an instructed verdict in its favor for the plaintiff’s failure to prove her allegations of negligence. There was evidence that the decedent, together with his son, 16 years of age, and another man, were riding in a Chevrolet roadster through the town of Monitor. All three knew how to drive automobiles. The decedent was familiar with the road as it passed through Monitor. Not long before the date of the acci*354dent, he had written to the railroad company, pointing out the dangers of the crossing,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hines v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
  2. Peters v. Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. ConditOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API