Darby's Lessee v. Mayer
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR to the Circuit Court of West Tennessee.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson
This was an action of ejectment, in which the present plaintiff was plaintiff in the Court below. His title is derived through a patent to onevJphn Rice, and successive convevances down to him- ¿elf, which it is immaterial to recapitulate, since no question arises upon’this part of the evidence. The defence set up was the statute of limitations, and in order to bring himself within its provisions, the defendant received the patent under which the plaintiff claims, as the patent for his own land, and undertakes to connect himself with it. This gave rise to a variety of exceptions táken by the…
2Cited by32 opinions
- Robertson v. PickrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Shepherd v. NaborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Thrasher v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Campbell v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hindman v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 1950
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.