Vidi v. United Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, the United Surety Company, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county • of New York on the 8th day of October, 1912, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
Action to recover upon a statutory bond given by the defendant Polowe, Mogilewsky & Werner, a domestic corporation, as principal, and the United Surety Company as surety. At the trial there was no dispute between the parties as to the facts. They were, in substance, as follows: Prior to the 30th of July, 1907, Polowe, Mogilewsky & Werner were engaged in the city of New York in selling steamship tickets for transportation to foreign countries, and in connection therewith received deposits of money for transmission; on that day it, as principal, and the surety company, as surety,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the New York Institution for the Instruction of the Deaf & DumbNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Emery v. . BaltzNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Picker v. FitzelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Barker v. Town of FloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chain v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Continental Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. AinsworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Goldberg v. People's Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Engelheim v. Illinois Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1914
- Chain v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936