Legal Opinion
United States v. Hall
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided November 15, 1991No. ACMR 9003107PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HAGAN, Judge:
A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted the appellant, based upon mixed pleas, of one specification of sodomy, and of two specifications of adultery and videotaping those acts, in violation of Articles 125 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 933 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to dismissal and forfeiture of $1000 pay per month for three months.
The errors claimed are, first, that the specifications alleging adultery and sodomy are multiplicious for sentencing;…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. ArabArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- Able v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. HallU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992