Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Title & Trust Co. v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1902No. Appeal, No. 111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 111, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiff;, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1899, No. 713, non obstante veredicto, in case of Pennsylvania Title & Trust Company, Administrator of Anna Baumann, Deceased, v. George Meyer et al., Partners as the Real Estate Loan & Trust Company. Assumpsit to recover a bank deposit.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 111, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiff;, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1899, No. 713, non obstante veredicto, in case of Pennsylvania Title & Trust Company, Administrator of Anna Baumann, Deceased, v. George Meyer et al., Partners as the Real Estate Loan & Trust Company. Assumpsit to recover a bank deposit. Before McClong, J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $5,305, subject to a question of law reserved as follows : Whether the admitted fact that Frank J. Fertig checked the money, here sued for, out of the bank upon checks signed in the…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below in entering judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Bankers National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Pennsylvania Co. for Ins. v. Ninth Bk. T. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Trestrail v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Weiner v. North Penn Bank Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Hamilton v. Beaver Falls S. & L. Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API