Legal Opinion
Chrysler Capital Corp. v. Citibank, N. A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 8, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered April 30, 1992, which denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 327, 3211 (a) (4) and (7), and for a protective order, and granted plaintiff’s motion to compel disclosure, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to disturb plaintiff’s choice of a New York forum (see, Banco Ambrosiano v Artoc Bank & Trust, 62 NY2d 65, 73-74). While the television station that is the subject of the Federal foreclo*394sure action is located in Ohio, most of the contracts in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Banco Ambrosiano v. Artoc Bank & Trust Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Whitney v. WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Waterways Limited v. Bar-clays Bank PLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Morgulas v. J. Yudell Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eileen W. v. Mario A.New York City Family Court · 1996
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993