Legal Opinion

City of Charleston v. Cadle

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application for leave to appear as amicus curice, and file brief and petition for rehearing.

1Judgment of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

In this case an opinion was filed with which counsel in the case seemed to be content. The opinion was duly published in 166 Ill. 487, and certain attorneys who were not engaged in the case applied for leave to appear as amicus curias and file a brief in this case and a petition for rehearing. We have heretofore, in the Northern Grand Division, when the question was presented to us, refused to permit persons who were not attorneys in the case in any way, to appear and file briefs unless it was at the request or assent of the attorneys engaged in the cause, and this motion to appear as amicus…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Charleston v. CadleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Boyd v. Brazil Block Coal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Burns v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API