Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Citizens for Marriage v. Secretary of the Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Massachusetts Citizens for Marriage and its president, Sarah McVay Paw-lick, appeal from a judgment of a single justice of this court dismissing their complaint for declaratory relief. The complaint alleges that a joint session of the General Court violated the Constitution by failing to vote on a so-called initiative amendment, in accordance with art. 48, The Initiative, IV, §§ 2-4, as amended by art. 81, § 1, of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth. The plaintiffs sought an order instructing the Secretary of the Commonwealth to “send” the initiative amendment “to the 183rd…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bates v. Director of the Office of Campaign & Political FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Limits v. President of the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. League of Women Voters v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Angelico v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Wallerstein v. Board of Bar ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Committee for Health Care for Massachusetts v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API