Legal Opinion

Walsh v. . Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1922PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of- the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 11, 1920, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term. The action was brought to impress a trust upon a savings bank deposit.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of- the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 11, 1920, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term. The action was brought to impress a trust upon a savings bank deposit. On January 8, 1903, respondent executors’ testatrix, Bridget Coll, opened an account with the respondent bank in the following manner, viz., “ Bridget Coll for sister Rose,” and thereafter said Bridget Coll made further deposits in said account.…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: McLaughlin, J.

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re PetersenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  2. Rodgers EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. In re the Estate HerleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. In re HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. In re the Estate of KrycunNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API